K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist vs. Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App: An In-Depth Comparison

Introduction

Shopify merchants face a crowded app market where choosing a single-purpose tool can feel like a high-stakes gamble. Wishlists are a common first step toward higher conversion and retention, but differences in features, customization, analytics, and long-term value can make one app better suited than another depending on the store's needs.

Short answer: K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist is an attractive option for merchants who want a simple, brandable wishlist with a clear free tier and quick setup. Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App is better suited for merchants that need category-based wishlists, deeper CSS-level customization, and straightforward analytics on wishlist popularity. For merchants who want to avoid tool sprawl and capture greater lifetime value through loyalty, referrals, reviews, and wishlists in a single solution, Growave presents a higher-value alternative.

This post provides a feature-by-feature comparison of K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist (Kaktus) and Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App (Squadkin Technologies Pvt Ltd), using their public ratings, review counts, pricing tiers, and stated features. It also outlines the practical implications of those differences for common merchant scenarios and explores an integrated alternative that reduces app fatigue and increases customer lifetime value.

K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist vs. Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App: At a Glance

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Core Wishlist Functionality

K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist focuses on core wishlist mechanics: add-to-wishlist buttons, a floating action button, a header icon, and the ability to present the wishlist as a page, popup, or embedded block. These are the features that most stores need to start collecting product interest: they make it easy for shoppers to save items, return to them, and share lists.

Squadkin centers its value on multi-category wishlists and guest support. It explicitly allows customers to create multiple categories for saved items, mark favorites, and share lists with shareable links. The app promotes the ability to pick up where shoppers left off when they return, which requires persistence across sessions for both logged-in users and guests.

Strengths (K Wish List):

• Immediate visibility with floating action button and header icon.
• Multiple display modes (page, popup, embedded) to fit different themes.
• Social sharing built-in to encourage gift-list behavior and referrals.

Strengths (Squadkin):

• Unlimited categories to organize wishlists by event or type.
• Guest wishlist support that helps reduce friction for non-logged-in shoppers.
• Built-in analytics showing top wishlisted products.

Practical implication: For a store that wants shoppers to save items quickly without any extra configuration, K’s UI-focused approach is faster to deploy. For a store that sells products across distinct use cases (e.g., home goods vs. holiday gifts) and needs shoppers to organize saves into categories, Squadkin’s multi-category architecture will be more useful.

UX, Branding, and Customization

K Wish List sells itself on brand fit: icons, labels, and colors are customizable so the wishlist can blend with the store’s visual identity. The app emphasizes a no-code setup that still allows adjustments to how the wishlist appears, which suits merchants that want a polished look without developer time.

Squadkin is built for merchants that want full control at the CSS level. It notes “Fully Customization using CSS,” which enables deep changes to animations, layout, typography, and responsive behaviors. For design teams that maintain a strict visual system, Squadkin provides the hooks to implement bespoke UX.

When to choose which:

• If design resources are limited and time-to-live matters, K’s no-code appearance and preset templates will reduce build time.
• If consistent, unique visual identity is a priority and a developer can implement CSS safely, Squadkin allows more exacting design work.

Sharing and Viral Potential

Both apps include social sharing as part of their feature set. K emphasizes wishlist sharing for gift buying and events; Squadkin supports shareable links for wishlists via social media or email. Sharing amplifies discovery and drives traffic back to specific product pages or the wishlist itself.

Differences:

• K’s floating button + sharing is focused on easy save-and-share behavior.
• Squadkin’s shareable links and category-based lists can help create more curated, event-specific shares (e.g., a bridal registry or party wishlist).

Merchants should evaluate how much social sharing matters to conversion—if gift purchases and shared lists are a major acquisition channel, confirm whether the app supports open link previews, meta tags, and persistent URL handling.

Data & Analytics

A wishlist’s value goes beyond saved items; it’s a signal of demand. Squadkin lists specific analytics: a report of top-10 wishlisted products. That kind of built-in insight makes it easier to run targeted campaigns, restock high-interest SKUs, or feature popular items in email flows.

K offers tracking of wishlist usage to “gain insights into customer interest,” but the public feature list does not highlight an explicit top-items report. K’s analytics appear more basic, focused on counts and usage rather than curated leaderboards.

Practical takeaways:

• If a merchant relies on wishlist data to inform merchandising and promotional cadence, Squadkin’s explicit leaderboards are a direct win.
• If the wishlist is primarily for UX and social reasons, K’s basic tracking may be sufficient.

Guest Wishlist and Account Persistence

Guest wishlist capability removes the friction of account creation. Squadkin explicitly supports guest wishlists and persistence, so shoppers can add items without signing up and still have their list when they come back (usually via a cookie or shareable link). This lowers conversion friction and captures intent from infrequent visitors.

K supports “Customers Wishlists,” which suggests account-linked persistence, but the emphasis is on the logged-in experience and social sharing. K also provides popup and embedded wishlist types that work across devices.

Recommendation:

• Stores with high guest traffic or where account creation rates are low should prioritize an app with robust guest wishlist flows (Squadkin).
• Stores that prioritize account-linked loyalty programs and member benefits might prefer the account-linked features of K, especially if the wishlist is paired with a loyalty layer.

Mobile Behavior and Checkout Compatibility

K lists “Works With: Checkout” indicating explicit compatibility with the Shopify checkout experience. Mobile UX is crucial for wishlists because many shoppers save items from mobile browsing sessions; a floating button or sticky icon must be optimized for touch behavior. K’s floating button and popup layouts are common mobile-friendly patterns.

Squadkin’s public data does not list specific “Works With” items. That absence doesn’t mean incompatibility, but it does mean merchants should test checkout and mobile flows before committing.

Advice: Request a demo or test in a development store to confirm how the wishlist interacts with cart flows, draft orders, and checkout in your theme—especially if checkout extensions or third-party checkout apps are in use.

Performance, Setup Time, and Technical Overhead

K: marketed as set up in minutes with no coding required. For stores without developer bandwidth, that low-friction setup is a meaningful advantage.

Squadkin: supports custom CSS and offers guest wishlist functionality, implying slightly more technical setup if design or session persistence behavior is customized.

Both apps are single-purpose, which reduces initial complexity but increases the chance of tool sprawl over time—every additional retention or engagement need will likely require another app.

Integrations and Ecosystem

K and Squadkin are focused on wishlist functionality; neither positions itself as a full retention platform. K notes “Works With: Checkout” but otherwise lists limited app integrations in its public description. Squadkin’s integration list isn’t specified publicly.

This narrow integration surface can be fine for stores whose tech stack is minimal. However, for stores that already use email marketing (Klaviyo, Omnisend), customer support (Gorgias), subscription billing (Recharge), or advanced analytics, the cost of stitching wishlist data into those platforms can be higher.

Tip: If deeper integrations or webhooks matter, request documentation or a technical conversation to confirm how wishlist events can be exported or pushed to the rest of the marketing stack.

Pricing & Value

K Wish List pricing:

• Free: Free to install. Includes float button, header icon, add-to-wishlist button, notifications, social sharing, popup & embedded types, customer wishlists, and support.
• Growth: $6.70/month. Appears to include the same core features.
• Growth 2: $19.99/month. Same listed feature set at a different price point.

Squadkin pricing:

• Basic: $3.99/month. Includes multiple categories, guest wishlist, custom CSS, text customization, social sharing, unlimited wishlists, and analytics.

Practical analysis:

• K’s free plan gives a lot of common wishlist functionality at no cost, which is beneficial for early-stage stores on a tight budget. The paid tiers appear to scale without necessarily adding new categories of functionality (public descriptions list the same features).
• Squadkin’s paid plan is inexpensive and positions itself as the small recurring fee for category support and analytics. For stores that need categories and guest flow but limited other features, Squadkin is cost-effective.

Value-for-money framing:

• K offers better value for merchants who want a ready-to-go, visually integrated wishlist and the safety of a free tier to test conversion impact.
• Squadkin offers better value for merchants who explicitly need multiple wishlist categories, guest persistence, and built-in popularity analytics at a low monthly fee.

Caveat: Both apps are single-feature solutions; as a merchant’s needs expand—loyalty, referrals, reviews, VIP tiers—adding multiple single-purpose apps can compound monthly costs and introduce integration drag.

Support, Reviews, and Reliability Signals

The public review data is useful but must be interpreted carefully:

• K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist: 81 reviews, rating 4.7. A larger review count suggests broader adoption and more varied feedback. A 4.7 average indicates strong satisfaction among users.
• Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App: 5 reviews, rating 4.9. A near-perfect rating but with a much smaller sample size; the result is promising but carries greater variance risk.

Support claims:

• K advertises “Knowledgeable Support.” Larger user counts typically correlate with more robust support processes, but confirmation is best done through a trial or demo.
• Squadkin’s support model is not detailed publicly; a merchant should test support responsiveness during the free trial or initial setup.

Recommendation: Evaluate support quality by raising a technical question during the onboarding period and measuring response time and helpfulness. This can be a stronger signal than star ratings alone.

Security, Data Ownership, and Compliance

Both apps operate on Shopify’s platform and must follow Shopify’s app guidelines. Merchants should ask each vendor about:

• Data retention policies for wishlist events.
• Export options for wishlist data (CSV or API).
• GDPR and CCPA compliance mechanisms if relevant to customer jurisdiction.
• How guest wishlist persistence is implemented (cookies, local storage, or server-side identifiers).

Checklist merchants should request:

• Documentation for data export or webhooks.
• Security practices related to customer data handling.
• Clear terms about ownership of wishlist data.

Pros and Cons Summary

K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist

• Pros:
  • Free tier with robust display options.
  • No-code setup and visual customization.
  • Floating button and header icon options for consistent visibility.
  • Decent review volume (81) and a strong aggregate rating (4.7).
• Cons:
  • Analytics appear basic compared to category-based leaderboards.
  • Paid tiers do not publicly show significant feature differentiation.
  • Single-purpose app that will need companion apps for loyalty, referrals, reviews.

Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App

• Pros:
  • Multi-category wishlist support and guest wishlist persistence.
  • Custom CSS allows deep styling control.
  • Built-in analytics for top wishlisted products.
  • Low monthly price point ($3.99).
• Cons:
  • Very small review sample (5), which reduces confidence in representativeness.
  • No public “Works With” integrations listed; integration surface may be limited.
  • Might require developer time to achieve advanced customizations.

Who Should Use Which App?

K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist is best for:

• Small-to-medium stores that need a quick wishlist implementation.
• Merchants that prefer a no-code setup and want a free plan to test wishlist impact.
• Stores where merchandising and analytics are handled through other platforms and the wishlist is primarily a UX tool to increase saves and social shares.

Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App is best for:

• Stores that need category-based wishlists for different events, product lines, or customer segments.
• Merchants that require guest wishlist persistence without forcing account creation.
• Brands with design resources that want precise control via custom CSS and who want built-in top-item analytics.

The Alternative: Solving App Fatigue with an All-in-One Platform

The problem of app fatigue

App fatigue happens when a store accumulates multiple single-purpose apps to handle retention, acquisition, and social proof—wishlists, loyalty, referrals, reviews, UGC widgets, and VIP tiers each come from different vendors. The consequences are practical and measurable:

• Monthly recurring costs multiply.
• Data lives in silos, complicating customer journeys and personalization.
• Site performance can suffer from multiple scripts.
• Integration overhead grows as marketing flows and automations require stitching data across apps.
• Operational complexity increases for support, billing, and vendor management.

For many merchants, the initial appeal of a low-cost single-purpose app turns into technical debt as new needs surface.

Growave’s “More Growth, Less Stack” proposition

Growave positions itself as a retention platform that reduces tool sprawl while combining essential retention mechanisms into a single, integrated suite. The core promise is that a unified approach to loyalty, referrals, reviews, and wishlists yields better outcomes than discrete apps stitched together.

Key product pillars:

• Loyalty and rewards program management, including points, tiers, and custom reward actions.
• Referral campaigns to turn customers into advocates.
• Reviews and user-generated content tools to collect and display social proof.
• Wishlist features integrated with the rest of the retention stack and customer profiles.
• VIP tiers and membership mechanics to segment and incentivize high-value customers.

Merchants interested in reducing the number of vendor touchpoints can review pricing and plans to see which tier fits current order volume and feature needs; this allows an apples-to-apples assessment of replacing multiple single-purpose apps with one integrated system. Explore how merchants can consolidate retention features.

Book a personalized demo to see how an integrated retention stack accelerates growth.
This sentence is a hard CTA linked to Growave's demo page.

How an integrated suite changes the economics

When wishlist, loyalty, referrals, and reviews work from a shared profile and analytics layer:

• Wishlist saves can directly trigger targeted reward flows (for example, points for adding items to a wishlist or bonus points when a wishlisted item goes on sale).
• Referral incentives can be tied to loyalty tiers for better control of acquisition costs.
• Review requests can be sequenced based on loyalty status or wishlist activity, increasing review volume and relevance.
• Unified reporting simplifies measuring lift in repeat purchase rate and customer lifetime value (LTV).

These combined behaviors increase retention more efficiently than implementing isolated incentives across multiple disconnected apps.

Feature parity and then some

Comparison to single-purpose wishlist apps:

• Growave includes a wishlist module but pairs it with native loyalty and referral tools, eliminating the need to buy a separate wishlist app and a separate loyalty app.
• Reviews and UGC tools are built-in, meaning wishlist popularity can map directly to review solicitation and display workflows. Merchants can collect and showcase authentic reviews without a separate review widget.

Merchants who need enterprise-grade capabilities—multi-language support, headless API, or a dedicated launch plan—can look at higher tiers designed for scale. For merchants on Shopify Plus, Growave provides tailored solutions and integrations that address high-growth requirements; those exploring dedicated Plus options can evaluate solutions for high-growth Plus brands.

How Growave integrates with common stacks

Growave supports a range of integrations that matter for retention and email orchestration. Where K and Squadkin are primarily wishlist tools with limited integration surfaces, Growave is built to exchange events and customer state with:

• Email automation platforms (e.g., Klaviyo, Omnisend).
• Customer support and helpdesk tools (e.g., Gorgias).
• Subscription billing platforms (e.g., Recharge).
• Shop builders and page editors (Pagefly, GemPages). This broader integration capability helps turn wishlist signals into personalized campaigns and makes it easier to act on product interest.

Growave’s integration approach helps merchants create flows like:

• Sending a targeted discount email to customers who have wishlisted an item for 30 days.
• Awarding loyalty points when a wishlisted product is purchased.
• Offering double referral rewards during promotional windows to supercharge customer advocacy.

Merchants evaluating the move from discrete wishlist + loyalty apps to a unified suite can compare plan features and limits to determine at what scale consolidation becomes both operationally easier and better value. To compare plans and usage limits with current monthly app spend, merchants can consolidate retention features.

Real-world outcomes and proof points

Growave publishes customer stories that highlight practical outcomes—higher repeat purchase rates, increased review volume, and smoother loyalty program launches. Merchants curious about how peer stores implemented integrated programs should read customer stories for patterns worth emulating: customer stories from brands scaling retention.

How Growave addresses the specific gaps left by single-purpose wishlist apps

• Analytics: Growave combines wishlist data with purchase and loyalty behavior, enabling smarter segmentation than a wishlist-only top-10 report.
• Guest workflows: Where guest wishlist persistence is valuable, Growave supports flows that link wishlist actions to referral and reward incentives, improving re-engagement.
• Performance: Consolidation reduces third-party scripts and the operational overhead of maintaining multiple app vendors.
• Long-run ROI: Because Growave is multi-functional, the marginal cost of adding loyalty or referral functionality is lower than adding a separate app for each capability; merchants often achieve higher LTV and lower churn.

Merchants who want to evaluate switching or consolidating can install Growave directly; for frictionless onboarding, the app is available to install directly from the Shopify App Store.

Merchants that want to review the loyalty capabilities in isolation can explore how to build loyalty and rewards that drive repeat purchases. For stores that prioritize social proof through product reviews and UGC, it’s useful to see how to collect and showcase authentic reviews across product and marketing pages.

Pricing comparison — the real numbers

Single-purpose wishlist apps are inexpensive per month, and that makes them tempting as a first choice. However, the total cost of ownership rises as more single-purpose apps are added:

• Example single-purpose stack cost:
  • Wishlist app A: $4–$20/mo
  • Loyalty app B: $20–$50/mo
  • Reviews app C: $20–$50/mo
  • Referral app D: $0–$50/mo
  • Total: $44–$170+/mo (plus integration and development costs)
• Growave unified approach:
  • Free plan available for initial testing.
  • Entry Plan $49/mo includes Loyalty & Rewards, Reviews & UGC, Referrals, Wishlist, and basic integrations.
  • Growth $199/mo adds greater volumes and customization.
  • Plus $499/mo includes enterprise capacities and dedicated support.

Merchants should calculate current monthly app spend and compare it against Growave’s pricing tiers to determine when consolidation yields better value and easier operations. For a clear evaluation of plans relevant to store scale, merchants can consolidate retention features.

Migration and Practical Considerations

If a merchant decides to move from a single-purpose wishlist app to an integrated platform, the main practical considerations are data migration, customer experience continuity, and tracking.

Key steps:

• Export wishlist data (if the current app allows CSV export) and confirm the target platform can import or map saved items to customer accounts or guest identifiers.
• Audit any front-end snippets, floating buttons, or popups to avoid duplicate UI elements during the migration window.
• Recreate essential automations (e.g., abandoned wishlist emails or save-to-wishlist triggers) in the new platform, and allow parallel testing before decommissioning old apps.
• Validate that integrations (analytics, marketing, support) continue to receive events and that reporting retains historical continuity where possible.

Growave’s onboarding for higher tiers includes migration support and a dedicated launch plan, which can reduce operational uplift when consolidating multiple apps. Merchants evaluating migration can consolidate retention features and schedule a migration conversation.

Practical Recommendations by Merchant Type

• Small boutique with minimal dev resources:
  • Short term: Install K Wish List’s free plan to enable wishlist behavior quickly.
  • Mid term: Evaluate consolidated options once loyalty and reviews become priorities.
• Growing brand that needs multi-category organization and guest persistence:
  • Squadkin is a low-cost option with multi-category support and built-in analytics. Expect some CSS work to match the brand.
• Merchant aiming to scale retention and LTV:
  • Evaluate an integrated platform to avoid the long tail of app maintenance. Compare current monthly spend on separate solutions to integrated plans and consider the operational benefits of unified analytics and customer profiles.
• Enterprise or high-volume Shopify Plus store:
  • Integrated platforms with headless APIs, dedicated onboarding, and 24/7 support provide predictable outcomes. Explore options built for Plus stores and integration partners to avoid bespoke stacking.

Conclusion

For merchants choosing between K Wish List‑Advanced Wishlist and Squadkin ‑ Multi Wishlist App, the decision comes down to priorities and growth plans. K Wish List is a strong choice for merchants who want a fast, brandable, no-code wishlist with a generous free tier and a proven user base (4.7 rating across 81 reviews). Squadkin is better for merchants needing multi-category organization, guest wishlist persistence, custom CSS, and explicit top-item analytics at a low monthly price (4.9 rating across 5 reviews).

Both apps solve a single, important problem well—but single-purpose apps can become limiting as retention needs expand. For merchants looking to reduce vendor complexity and invest in long-term customer lifetime value, a unified retention platform can be a better value for money.

Growave offers an integrated alternative that brings wishlist, loyalty, referrals, and reviews into a single suite, reducing tool sprawl and enabling coordinated campaigns that lift repeat purchases and engagement. For a side-by-side look at how consolidation compares with a stacked approach, merchants can consolidate retention features and see how integrated workflows replace multiple discrete automations. Growave’s platform also makes it easy to collect and showcase authentic reviews and to build loyalty and rewards that drive repeat purchases. Install directly from the Shopify marketplace or evaluate plans to compare costs: install directly from the Shopify App Store.

Start a 14-day free trial to test Growave's integrated retention stack and see immediate lift in engagement.
This sentence is a hard CTA linked to Growave's pricing and trial page.

FAQ

What are the main differences in ratings and review counts between K Wish List and Squadkin?
K Wish List has a larger sample of user feedback with 81 reviews and a 4.7 average rating, which suggests broad usage and consistent satisfaction. Squadkin has a higher average rating at 4.9 but only 5 reviews, so the smaller sample reduces statistical confidence. Both ratings are positive; merchants should test each app in a development store to validate behavior against their theme and traffic patterns.

If budget is the primary constraint, which app is the better choice?
For immediate budget sensitivity, K Wish List’s free tier provides a full-featured wishlist that can be installed without monthly cost, making it the best low-risk option to validate wishlist impact. Squadkin’s Basic plan ($3.99/month) is also inexpensive and adds category and guest features that some merchants will find worth the price. For long-term value, evaluate how multiple single-purpose apps add up compared to an integrated solution.

How does guest wishlist functionality differ between the two apps?
Squadkin explicitly advertises guest wishlist support and persistence, enabling non-logged-in users to save items and return to their lists. K supports customer wishlists and social sharing, but its guest wishlist behavior is less emphasized in public materials. Merchants that rely on guest flows should test Squadkin’s persistence methods and K’s guest experience before choosing.

How does an all-in-one platform compare to specialized wishlist apps?
An all-in-one platform reduces tool sprawl by combining wishlist functionality with loyalty, referrals, reviews, and VIP tiers. That consolidation improves data continuity, lowers integration overhead, and makes it easier to run personalized retention campaigns using wishlist signals. For many merchants, the integrated approach produces better long-term value and simpler operations than maintaining multiple single-purpose apps. Merchants can compare consolidation economics and features to their current stack to decide whether a unified platform is the right next step.